Itranspired the manager could survive defeat by lower-league opposition. Survive losing a crucial continental showpiece against a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood home defeats to domestic rivals, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, undermining some of the club’s best homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, calling his team the poorest the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to dance. You come at the sporting director, and you best not miss.
Regrettably, similar to numerous top-flight defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have missed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who often railed at his players for losing one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of a England's top division's most feared football executives.
In truth, this entire painful saga seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, given his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to regard Jason Wilcox as little more than a drudge within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due as much to his close relationship with his former boss Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive earlier, Jason Wilcox has proved himself as one of football's strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which United’s competitors will now be justifiably concerned.
For example, this was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the hierarchy that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, was instrumental in attempting to convince him to abandon his beloved 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties met a certain resistance. But perhaps these judgements hold greater authority when delivered from the mouth with the impeccable soccer background he possesses, holder of three England caps and a role in a championship team from 31 years ago.
Perhaps in time he may be persuaded to outline his thought processes publicly. Perhaps at some point he might be asked why Amorim is departing with a full payout, with no penalty clause in place. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as him – simply operate on a plane exceeding our mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not quite the same as being prepared to comprehend it.
But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we overlook the true genius behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, merely executing the directives of his ultimate line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has made very clear his desire for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for United to embrace analytics and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he declared that the team's approach of play “will be decided in this room”.
Ultimately, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical football matters, drawing from his previous experience in petrochemicals and yachting. Above all he is incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply superior. Who else would you trust to manage a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the construction of a new stadium that looks similar to an abstract design, the acquisition of a new striker?
This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent in top-tier of the game. For decades, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to subordinate staff like managers, talent spotters – players themselves. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with ideas and energy to go into an organization and implement their plan through to completion. But how many businesses have these guys set up? How many large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to place the real power where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the tactics in the boardroom and appoint a coach who can tailor their offering to suit. If managers were once chefs, they have become more akin to delivery personnel: not really responsible for the product, but still finally accountable should it be delivered poorly or leaks out to meet standards.
In the meantime, their job is increasingly not about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the visible figurehead for a club they can do little to influence. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of very young players into Europe and wins two medium-sized trophies, and essentially is dismissed for talking. Wilfried Nancy finds his reputation ruined while those individuals who appointed him continue to make errors indefinitely.
And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism at work: the elevation of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose errors can invariably be resolved by sacking without explanation. Hire the 3-4-3 coach only to fire them for playing too much that system. Bring in the project manager and later discard him for taking too long. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for the latest summer signings, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.
A seasoned web developer and digital strategist with over a decade of experience in creating impactful online solutions for diverse industries.